Bias as a noun: prejudice in
favor of or against one thing, person or group compared with another in a way
considered to be unfair.
Thursday
the infamous Peter Strzock gave some
testimony to a joint session of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees. I
wasn’t able to catch much of it live but there’s plenty of it on You Tube and
video out there if you think your brain won’t go numb watching it. It’s
grueling but I recommend viewing some of the live action for yourself rather
than rely on the mainstream media’s predictably pro left interpretation of what
they wish happened.
Among
other clips, I watched all 28 minutes of Trey Gowdy’s interview of Strzock. The
only reason it took 28 minutes was democrats spent nine minutes trying to
derail the interrogation by questioning a “point of order.” Like Strzock, I had
to be reminded what the question was by the time they shut up and quit
interrupting.
The
rest of the time what I saw was Gowdy making Strzock look like a fool and a
liar. But I’m conservative. I’ve already heard from some liberal friends (the
ones who are capable of a civil conversation) that what they saw was Gowdy
badgering Strzock about his personal opinions which had nothing to do with his
professional performance.
With
all due respect to my civil liberal friends (both of you), I seriously have to
wonder how badly you want to believe in unicorns to believe that.
In a
separate interview Darrel Issa, R-CA (almost as rare as a unicorn), made Strzok
read some of his own text messages to his now well-known mistress and FBI
attorney, Lisa Page. I will grant you it was humiliating. I was even uncomfortable
watching it and I think Strzok is a traitor who should be hanged or at least sent
to prison for 40 to 700 years. But if you’re going to commit stupid acts
sometimes you have to admit in public you were stupid.
Issa
made him read his response to a question from Page on Aug. 16, 2016, “He’s not
ever going to become president right? Right?”
Strzok
read, “No, no he’s not. We’ll stop him.” Strzock later told Gowdy that “we’ll”
referred to the American people.
Sure
it did.
Issa
also made him read the following text to Page from August 15, 2016, “I want to believe the path you threw out
for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he could be elected, but
I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the
unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”
Gee, I wonder
what he meant by insurance policy. He couldn’t have been talking about the
completely bogus piece of fiction known as the Steele Dossier, could he? No, of
course not.
You can find
the transcript for yourself but honorable agent Peter Strzock referred to Trump
in other texts as an idiot, a douche and a disaster, and those are just the
words that I’m willing to spell because I fear a couple of my younger nieces
may occasionally read what I have to say.
Yet Strzock
insisted in his testimony to Issa and to Gowdy that in no way did his personal
opinions cloud or influence his professional judgement. Umm-hmm. Insurance policy?
I’m not the
originator of this thought but you have to wonder how his line of reasoning
went over with Mrs. Strzok when Peter Peter Pumpkin Eater tried to explain away
Lisa Page? “Sure I was having an affair with her but at no time did it
influence my commitment to our marriage or affect the integrity of my wedding
vows.”
What?
Gowdy read one
of Strzock’s texts to Page from 11/7/16 on the eve of the election when some on
the left were cognizant enough to realize the wheels were coming off, “OMG,
this is effing terrifying.”
On 5/17/17,
Mueller’s gang of villagers with pitchforks was officially formed and by 5/18,
Strzock was already talking about impeachment of the President as the desired
outcome. He did it again on 5/22. In neither case had a single interview that
has been logged by the Mueller investigation and fish fry been conducted.
Strzock again
claimed to Gowdy that that was only his personal desire but it had no effect on
his professional conduct. No bias there.
People who
are comfortable with that explanation make me nervous.
Toward the
end of his little chat with Strzok after he was done exposing him as a traitor
and a fraud, Gowdy did say, “No wonder Mueller kicked you off the committee,”
which actually seemed to take the smirk off of Stzock’s face for a moment.
It was not
Peter Strzock’s understanding that Mueller kicked him off the committee because
of any bias on Strzock’s part. Nope. Strzock understood that he was only kicked
off the committee because of the appearance
of bias.
Well, there
certainly is that.
Strzock began
to tell Gowdy that he didn’t appreciate Gowdy daring to question his integrity (Strzock
has to have to have some kind of narcissistic delusion going on to think he has
anything resembling integrity going
for him). Gowdy cut him off and gave what I thought was the highlight quote of
the day’s testimony:
“I don’t give
a damn what you appreciate, Agent Strzock. I don’t appreciate an FBI agent with
an unprecedented level of animus working on two major political investigations.” (The fairy tale alleging collusion between Trump and Russia as well as Strzock's work exonerating HRC of any of her many wrongdoings in her email scandal which is a whole other blog topic.)
I completely
agree with Gowdy and think Strzock—and others—are flagrant traitors and guilty
of more charges than I’m capable of writing. But as I said before, I am
conservative (no, really).
Some
democratic congressperson (I’m almost done and don’t feel like looking it up.
You can if you want.) said that Strzock deserved a purple heart for enduring
the unfair, super mean questioning by the republicans. A cry The Washington
Post took up on Friday. And that’s how some liberals feel about the exact same events
I just watched.
I have a
friend with a purple heart. Strzock doesn’t deserve a purple heart. He deserves
the brand of a traitor.
Food for
thought:
Last week, Joe Munchin, D-WV, told Chuck Schumer to “kiss my you-know-what” in response to Schumer trying to pressure democrats to block President Trump’s latest Supreme Court nominee.
Nielsen
released ratings last week that had The Food Network and HGTV both with more
viewers for the first time than CNN or MSNBC.
Not that we
can ever afford to get cocky and stay home from the polls or let our guard down
for a moment but one has to wonder what the Alt Left base has dwindled down to
and how hard they have to want to believe they are relevant.
They sure are noisy though, I’ll give
them that.
No comments:
Post a Comment