“Two
things can be true at once: guns can be used for evil and guns can be used for
good.” –Colion Noir, recently.
It seems
this nation is at a new “crossroads” every week or so. That may be overly
dramatic and naïve but there’s no doubt the new hot topic at the water cooler
is gun control. Or not.
One
side clamors for an outright ban of all firearms at the extreme to more gun
control laws on the more moderate end of the “It’s the gun’s fault,” argument.
The other side wants to put hand guns in their kid’s lunchboxes at the extreme
and they want more armed presence and protection in general and at schools in
particular at their more moderate end.
One
side is quick to want to abandon the Second Amendment of the Constitution and
the other side wants rocket launchers on their patios. And neither side seems
willing to listen to the other side, which is nothing new in the last nine
years or so of political discussions.
But
we should.
I am
so sick of pie charts, bar charts and adjusted data that I could scream. You should
only draw conclusions using facts but it can be awfully confusing even
discerning what the facts are and as usual, you can’t rely on today’s media for
much help with the truth.
Two
weeks ago I tried to research existing gun laws and discovered that there are
literally thousands of them. That is partially due to the fact that most gun
regulations are left up to individual states and the duplication of some of the
basics is overwhelming. Oh sure, there are federal gun laws that override
everything but there are some states that allow local municipalities to
override state gun laws and that really compounds the number of regulations.
My
conclusion is that we already have plenty of gun laws. What we may have is an
enforcement problem, and good luck with that. Start at the top with murder is
illegal and we have people willing to overlook that one a few thousand times
every year.
Enter
the pie charts. The U.S. has 88.8 guns per 100 people. Far more than second
place so obviously that’s the problem, right? If you cherry pick your data you
can find 71 other “developed” countries with a lower per capita gun murder rate
that the United States.
If
you don’t want to offend an awful lot of countries who didn’t realize they were
shitholes instead of developed nations by cherry picking your control group
there are actually 111 other countries that have higher gun homicide rates than
the U.S.
We
do have a lot of guns. I have friends who need more than one gun safe. I have
more friends who don’t own a single gun. Anecdotally, gun owners seem to be
split about 50/50 conservative or liberal either way. Lots of my liberal pals
own a dozen firearms and get real quiet when the “ban the NRA” conversations
start.
Fact,
I think: only 34-39% of U.S. households account for 100% of gun ownership. That’s
a range from Forbes Magazine, The Guardian and the F.B.I.
Here’s
another interesting statistic if you want to keep pulling out your bar graphs:
in national gun-related homicides per million guns, Taiwan is #1 at 177. The
oft cited, peaceful, gun-controlled Nederlands has 108.
The
U.S. has 34, lower than Italy, Ireland and Belgium, among others.
Please,
I am not trying to say guns are not used for nefarious and deadly purposes. C’mon.
That’s why we conservatives need to shut up for a minute and listen to those on
the left. Their concerns are real. Their feelings are genuine. The same people
who wore uniforms died for them to have their crazy liberal opinions just like
we are entitled to our conservative thoughts.
Besides,
I suppose there is always the chance they will have a good idea. But if they do
they need to be louder than the media and the politicians they constantly let
speak for them because those idiots can’t seem to do anything but parrot the
same old lines.
Plus,
you know what, the people on the left need to listen to us as well because this
Mexican standoff over the second amendment isn’t saving the lives of kids at
schools when active shooters show up. We are never going to give up all of our
guns and I have the distinct impression that like Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot, the
left is never going to stop asking us to.
I
love doing research, partly because there is so much information out there at a
keystroke and partly because some of it is so astoundingly inaccurate it can be
amusing. I found a Vox video asserting all the facts worth knowing about the “obvious
and undeniable gun problem in America.” They didn’t cite their sources but they
claimed 130 “mass shootings” in the U.S. from 2000-2013.
I
was shocked because my own research using multiple sources turned up 30 mass shootings
from 1999-current. Trying to find where Vox got their info I turned up another timeline
that had the count at 32 since 2000. Close enough for government work and amateur
blogs.
I
did finally stumble on a September 24, 2014 NYT article claiming the F.B.I.
statistic of 160 “mass shootings” involving active shooters in confined and
populated areas between 2000 and 2013. Of course, I also found the NYT
retraction on page A19 on October 14, 2014 (the only way to read the NYT is to
google “retractions {subject matter} after you read anything those creative
writers print) in which they clarified that the actual FBI statistic cited “active shooter incidents,” not “mass
shootings.” An active shooter incident is any situation where shooting is in
progress when law enforcement is contacted.
Sort
of different a little bit, but I figure Vox must’ve gotten their info similarly
confused.
Vox
had other statistics on guns and homicides that they failed to attribute so I kept
digging and found that most of their info was based on an early 1990’s study by
Hemeway and Miller and then applied to and mixed with incidents in the 21st
century. There is a Forbes article
(Google it yourself, I can’t do everything for you) discrediting the
Hemeway-Miller study as being based on a great deal of conjecture because the
gun ownership data they claimed was not available at the time of the study.
Forbes
also put forth an updated correlation of the Hemeway-Miller study using actual
gun-ownership data that says 92% of gun homicides cannot be explained simply by
gun availability, although it does seem rather self-explanatory that at the
moment of each gun homicide a gun was available. Statistics, eh?
Here’s
another fun thing to think about while you’re picking the lint out of your
navel: according to The National Research Council the United States does lead
most nations annually in the rate of non-gun homicides. Google the FBI stats on
murders by knives and hammers if you want to lay awake nights.
If
we’re going to have a discussion then let’s be honest and use real facts, and
for goodness sakes, listen to each other even if it makes your blood boil. Don’t
tell me how swell things are in Australia and Norway and we won’t tell you how
great they are in Switzerland or Israel.
The
mass shootings I care about stopping the most are the ones occurring here in
the U.S. of A. I don’t know what’s going on for sure in other countries
cultures. I can barely understand what is going on in this one most of the
time.
Here’s
one last set of statistics: In 2011 according to something I saw last week that
I forgot to document (sorry if you dispute it) we passed the tipping point in the U.S. wherein
over 50% of the country officially had cell phones. I can only imagine what the
percentage is today.
Cell phones are great for a lot
of stuff. Not so great for other stuff.
I don’t know if anyone knows the number but a huge percentage of us are
addicted to social media on our phones.
Fun stuff. Also a terrific platform making it impossible to escape
bullying, political vitriol, gossip, rumors, lies, truths you’d have been better
off not knowing and other subtle and not-so-subtle stressors.
For those of you who follow my
stuff, two weeks ago I documented (assuming my mass shooting timeline is right
because I believe it) 30 mass shootings in the last 19 years corresponding to
the introduction of violent video games with five mass shootings in the
previous 50 years. Of those 30 21st century (for the most part)
shootings 23 of them occurred after the 2011 cell phone majority threshold. Twenty
three. Seven years.
Not sure how many cell phones or
what social media platforms there are in Australia or Norway but sure, we can
keep blaming guns and only guns because cell phones don’t kill people, people
kill…hey wait a minute.
But you can’t put the genie back
in the bottle.
So if the left would please
listen to the right for just a second because, believe it or not, our opinions
count too even though we don’t wear pink hats with kitty ears on them or watch
as much CNN, we don’t think any number of laws will solve “America’s gun problem,”
mostly because we don’t think there’s a gun problem no matter how mad that
makes the left.
Our solution tends more toward
preparedness in lieu of changing reality. Start with taking down those ridiculous “gun free zone” targets.
Yes indeed, we are in favor of fewer school nutritionists and extra vice
principals and administrators and instead put a few armed retired military or
police officers on every high school campus in America and put up signs that
let the Dylan’s, Klebold’s and Cruz’s of the world know that if they come in
the door with a gun they are likely to leave on a stretcher.
If there are teachers who wish
to undergo training and carry or safe a weapon in their classrooms, please, let
them. Way more effective than a can of
corn or a thrown book at stopping a sick kid with a gun.
And oh my goodness, save the “it’s
not a Hollywood movie, what about kids in the crossfire,” argument for when you
lefties are hanging out on your own talking about how crazy we conservatives
are. At least there would be bullets flying in the general direction of the
crazy bastard shooting up your local high school. Don’t spill your wine.
No comments:
Post a Comment