Callum
Borchers of The Washington Post had an editorial piece this week on the big Fox
O’Reilly scandal wondering if the network will be able to survive the turmoil
with which it’s popular time slots have been beset in the last eight months.
Indeed, Greta Van Susteren left Fox News last
September because she was “disturbed by the culture.” That probably doesn’t
mean what the left would like us to believe—that the big forced sex party at
Fox News is too much for women to bear—since Greta was a staunch defender of
Roger Ailes, the network CEO who resigned following a flurry of sexual harassment
accusations which Greta felt had turned into a bit of a witch hunt.
I am
not saying there was or wasn’t sexual harassment by Ailes. I’m just repeating
what Greta said. Look it up yourself.
Then
Megyn Kelly abandoned ship in January after a tenuous relationship with our new
President and his millions of supporters who also happened to be Fox news
viewers. She cited the desire to spend more time with her young children as the
primary motivator for her move to NBC and more power to her for that. I can
only begin to imagine the time demands that come with an eight-figure salary.
Martha
MacCallum replaced Greta in the 7 p.m. time slot and turned in the biggest
quarter in that time slot’s history in the first quarter of 2017. Same with
Tucker Carlson at 9 p.m. where he replaced Megyn.
Borchers
even cedes those facts in his editorial and follows the concessions immediately
with the question, “But how many more changes can Fox News withstand?”
Do
you think he means before the network is overcome with success?
The
most recent data I can find still shows Fox News with more than double the
viewership of MSNBC between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m. Go ahead and pick a different
time slot, libs, if you think that will cheer you up. (Spoiler alert: It will
not.)
None
of this is to defend Bill O’Reilly against the mounting allegations of sexual harassment,
nor am I prepared to jump on the Crucifixion Committee. What I am is stunned by
the Left’s continued war on any possibility the Right could enjoy success or
popularity when the Left doesn’t want it to be so.
Fox
and O’Reilly did pay $13 million to five women over several years. That’s a
real fact, not an Associated Press speculation. It’s also a lot of money per
incident. I’ve heard many Left Wing media heads assert that where there is
smoke there must be fire.
Bill
Clinton was accused of all manner of rape and assault as well as “simple” harassment
17 times in 30 years. (How big must that bonfire be?) But the only payout on
public record is $850,000 from Clinton to Paula Jones.
Seventeen
claims and you can finish your term as president of the United States. Five
claims and you have to resign as a TV show host. I’m not saying either man may
be a shining example of good citizenship but the irony in what we will allow in
professional standards for a U.S. President v. a conservative network talk show
host is a little striking isn’t it?
O’Reilly
doesn’t need me to chime in on his defense. Right or wrong, he’ll be okay. He’ll
syndicate a column or start a blog or write some more books and continue to
have ten times more fans than Don Lemon’s mom can muster for The Lemonhead Fan
Club. (Ok, that was exactly like an Associated Press factoid.)
And
Fox News will be fine, which you would think is obvious but if Callum Borchers
can actually get ten column inches in a syndicated op-ed to suggest they will
not be then there are probably others salivating over the imagined demise of
the one and only, single, solitary conservative news channel in existence in
these United States.
Borchers reports (wait…no, I guess that’s right, he reported something) that Fox25News in Boston is changing their name to Boston25News in the wake of the Bill O’Reilly scandal because they consider the Fox News Label—the one still twice as popular as its closest competitor—to be a liability. And because they are run by the dumbest executives in TV since the clowns at A & E were ready to can Duck Dynasty (the most watched 30-minute show IN HISTORY) because Phil Robertson answered a question he was asked in an interview honestly if not politically correctly.
I know it drives the Left crazy that we even exist,
let alone in the numbers we do—you know, the kind of numbers that can elect a
President they don’t like or dominate TV news ratings with the one show they
hate more than broccoli—but I would hate it if we lost the lone voice of
conservatism on TV.
You certainly can’t count on liberal media scum to
report things like President Trump quietly completing negotiations last week
for the release of six U.S. citizens imprisoned in Cairo for three years
without any evidence against them for any crime and without ever being granted
a trial or a hearing of any kind.
Two of the
U.S. detainees were Aya Hijazi and her husband Muhammed Hassanein. Call me
racist but I think those sound like Middle Eastern names, maybe even Muslim.
And we all know Donald Trump wants to throw all Muslims out of the United
States. So since it doesn’t fit the leftist narrative let’s not report it at
all.
In fairness, I
did a sweep of print media looking for that story and I did find three
paragraphs under “News Briefs” buried on the inside pages of none other than
The Denver Post—my favorite opposition newsletter.
So Obama was
president for most of the three years they were imprisoned and nothing
happened. In less than 90 days Our President brought them home without
releasing any terrorists or delivering any pallets of cash. Huh.
Remember all
the front-page press Obama got for emptying five cells at Guantanamo Bay for
the return of one U.S. soldier. Until he turned out to be a deserter who had
gone AWOL and endangered his entire unit in the search for his sorry hind
parts. Then it became a slightly quieter story, unless of course you tuned in
occasionally to the lying bastards on Fox News.
Trump
negotiated the return of six Americans quietly, without a press conference,
without requesting a parade or any laurels for doing what comes as second
nature to him (that would be “the right thing” in case you watched the Obama
presidency so closely for so long you forgot what that was). Just like he has
done so often for underprivileged people for whom he has purchased houses,
provided jobs and paid tuition without seeking attention for it.
And certainly
without receiving any credit for it from the base creatures on the left who
sell us their “news” as if they can tell fact from fiction.
Yes, I would
miss the voice that told us what the Left didn’t want us to know. But I am more
than certain that Fox News will continue to outshine the best the Left can put
out there as cutting edge journalism, or whatever it is.
I just want to put my two cents worth in right here to begin to lobby for Dennis Miller to replace Bill O’Reilly. Not only would it be wildly entertaining, it might actually cause some strokes and aneurisms among the Callum Borchers of the world when Fox, once again, shattered their own records.
No comments:
Post a Comment