Saturday, January 21, 2017

Post Inaugural Thoughts (I didn't want to do it.)


So the left kind of took whining and moping a little further than I had forecast but was anyone really surprised to see them running down streets smashing windows of cars and businesses after the inauguration?

                At least they wore black masks because that’s what people of conviction who know they’re right do, I guess.

                A word of caution, though. They weren’t all rioting or cozened away in closets weeping and modeling Play-Doh, or lying on the floor of your local supermarket kicking their heels and flailing their arms in the biggest national temper tantrum this country may have ever seen. Some of them were quietly licking their wounds in the privacy of their own living rooms. Or maybe not so quietly, but at least in the privacy of their own living rooms. Kind or like the right did for the most part in 2012.

                Whether you can understand how they draw a single conclusion that they subscribe to or not, they still have a right to disagree with you. That is what this is democratic process is all about, right?.  And President Trump is going to work hard to win the right an opportunity to disagree with the left, I hear.

They don’t understand why we don’t believe abortion (which has been protected by law since 1973) is in imminent danger of disappearing; that we will round up all the Latinos and ship them back to Mexico and points south (remember they take him completely literally and not a bit seriously); that the LGBT will have to become an underground organization that can only meet in mosque basements—oh wait, probably not there; that Donald Trump will create too many jobs in America and then what are all the underdeveloped nation’s workers supposed to do (yup, heard that one this week); that Trump is “Hitleriean,” (so they still don’t get that the Nazi’s were socialists, that like Obama Hitler also hated Jews, that gun control was critical to his ability to hold power and that he used racial division to galvanize his power base).

                Maybe I could believe Trump benefitted from racial division that galvanized a power base but I can’t fathom they think he created the situation in less than a year when eight years of Obama’s racial hate speech had nothing to do with it.

                The point is that on their planet, which incredibly is also our planet, the left thinks the right is as completely screwed up as we think they are. No really. They do think that.

                And wouldn’t it be nice if we could all find some common ground to advance the great cause that is America? But that very thing is what I think they are calling “Hitlerian” which once again has me admitting I don’t really understand what they want.

                I do not envy Donald Trump in his objective to unite America. I’m not sure the left can ever be made happy but I will be the first to admit that I do not share their world view on hardly anything (thank God). And, honestly, I don’t think they want to be united.  And I don’t think the media would let it happen, but you already know what I think of those bottom-feeding creatures of the dark.

                This morning, reading the opposition newsletter that passes for our local paper—you probably get one too if you haven’t decided it’s too filthy to have in the same house as your children—I read an editorial-as-news piece of propaganda by The Washington Post (The Denver Post has its own reporters--some  kids named Noelle and Danika and Jesse who try to write big person stories but they apparently all want to work for the Associated Press one day instead).

                The WP described (without attribution, of course) Trump’s Inaugural Acceptance Speech as “combative” and “an ominous portrait of the nation,” “dark.”  In Margaret Taley’s opinion (one can only assume she fancies herself a reporter) Trump’s message made “little effort to reach beyond his political base or reassure foreign leaders.”

                In contrast the coverage I watched on Fox News described it as the most uplifting speech in recent inaugural history. That a reason for hope has been extended to middle class families who felt entirely disenfranchised by the Obama regime; jobs are coming back to the rust belt; the oil and gas industry can expect a recovery; Trump intends to focus much of his job creation effort (as opposed to more welfare) on helping inner city youths find legal and productive work; that our streets will once again become safe to walk without fear of getting caught in the crossfire of a gangland shooting.

                And that the guiding principles in all decisions and policies will be America and American citizens which seems like something a US President shouldn’t have to reassure folks of but here we are.  And the fact he wants to do that actually upsets the left.  No, I’m serious. In their living rooms that’s “Hitlerian.”

So the above paragraphs paint a pretty stark contrast, yes? If nothing else it would be swell if both sides agreed to disagree on whether or not the glass is half full instead of trying to bend each other to our respective wills, bayonet the wounded and take no prisoners.  Aaaargghhh.

I’m not trying to say we should all hold hands and sing Kumbayah. Ick. Make sure you know who you’re talking to but it’s ok to talk to each other about how goofy the other side is. I do not hate most of them. But I do hate a lot of them. Hate is such a horrible word and it really offends the more sensitive liberals which makes me wonder what they call it when their side murders police officers, beats people for wearing “Make America Great Again” clothing, burns the American Flag, takes a knee at football games or says some of the incredibly hateful, blasphemous things they say when given a microphone.

                In his book “Left Turn,” Glen Grossclose, a Stanford researcher and economics professor (at least when he wrote the book), describes all political thought as circular. In other words, we tend to read and watch sources that reinforce our political views.  We tend to hang out with and talk to people who reinforce our political views (take the state of California for example). We inevitably continue to reach the same conclusions we have always reached because our world view is a pretty fundamental part of who we are and limited exposure to theories or even evidence to the contrary are not likely to change either side’s minds.

                Talk about dark and hopeless. Unless maybe you woke up this morning seeing the glass as half full with a pitcher of ice water right beside it.  Sorry for those of you who want to hang yourselves.

                By the way, those polls that had Donald Trump’s preinauguration approval ratings running at 40-44%? I admittedly was unable to find the info I wanted on The Gallup Survey sample group but in CNN’s and ABC’s the sample group included 24% and 23% Republicans respectively. Seems a little skewed.

                No matter how far left you are, how do you continue to believe a media that 2/3’s of America professes to distrust and disbelieve with seriously good reason?

No comments:

Post a Comment