Sunday, October 29, 2017

Deflating The Football


Deflating The Football

                So as the protest of black oppression by some of the richest men of any color in the United States continues across the country today in increasingly empty football stadiums with increasingly shrinking television audiences, I thought it might be a constructive exercise to continue to deconstruct the liberal myths fueling the protest and begin a discussion of what, if anything, might be done to put a little air back into the football before these misguided fellows completely kill the golden goose.

                And I sadly have my doubts that the part of black culture that has bought into the victim mentality that holds forth that blacks can never succeed in this country as long as there are whites can be fixed in this generation or maybe even the next.

                So I keep hearing that the protest is about social justice but I have yet to hear a coherent definition of what social justice would look like. The topic seems to cover discrimination in the work place to inequality of wealth to police brutality to I don’t know what else.

                On social media this week there was some professor from the university of I Don’t Care claiming that algebra and geometry are racist. There seems to be a rather substantial push from some extreme quadrants for white people who never owned slaves to give money to black people who never were slaves because 150 years ago a small percentage of white people owned a large percentage of black people as slaves.

                So the topic is kind of broad and I have to agree with others who say no one really knows exactly what is being protested. I try to be careful not to make light of the absurdity of the extremes of some of the alleged issues because to just laugh at the fact that African-Americans are definitely upset about something is indeed racist, and I know I cross that line.

                But when THE Reverend Jesse Jackson says that in 150 years black people have only progressed from picking cotton balls to picking footballs and basketballs it is hard for my jaw not to drop open. When Whoopi Goldberg says she is being held a slave on whatever that silly pseudo-news show is that she’s on for however many millions of dollars they pay her for her suffering, how am I supposed to take that seriously?

                I know there is discrimination and that’s wrong. I know there is racial prejudice and that’s wrong. I think most of America is on board with me in acknowledging that and being willing to do what we can to make it better.

                I was alive when the Civil Rights Bill was passed. I was alive when Jim Crow laws were in effect although there was no evidence of them in the lilly-white suburb in which I grew up. I have seen this country in many ways make huge strides in eradicating racism and discrimination and creating equality of opportunity. At least I thought so.

                And then in 2008 this country elected its first African-American president which one would think signaled the ultimate in equality of opportunity and blindness to skin color. And then something unforeseen happened, and while this would pass for a fact on CNN or in the New York Times it is merely my opinion, that very president made race an issue of a proportion it had not seen since the 1960’s.

                Barack Obama pursued a social doctrine of turning people of different colors against each other until we reached a point where I (and others but you can point at me since I’m writing this) believe that perhaps the most egregious racists are black, not white. He popularized the narrative summed up in the rhetorical chant, “White greed creates black need.”

                He made horrible and incorrect statements about police officers before the facts were in and disproved his allegations and the liberal narratives of events that never happened the way they were portrayed (“Hands Up, Don’t Shoot,” for example) and were never recanted. He invited the single most hateful and violent racist organization in America--#blacklivesmatter—to the White House after supporters had murdered police officers and he praised them for their good works.

                “Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon.

                “How do we want “em?

                “Dead.

                “When do we want it?

                “Now.”

                Good works?

“Until the police accept responsibility for their discriminatory behavior toward people of color, there can be no peace.”
              --Barack Obama

Does that sound post-racial to anyone?

I don’t know who coined the term “The Ferguson Effect,” but it describes situations in which, either because they’ve been instructed to by city officials or because they are fearful of going into certain parts of their towns, police withdraw from proactive policing in black communities and crime rates spike.

Innocents who are the victims of those crimes are mad at the police for not protecting them. When the police do show up to do their jobs, members of inner-city communities are angry at them for targeting young black men…in predominately black communities where most of the criminals as well as the victims are black.

Last year black homocides climbed to 7,881 in the United States. That’s up from 6,000 the year before Ferguson. Police shootings of African-Americans has stayed consistently around 4% of that total. Black on black crime accounts for the rest.

According to Peter Kirsanov, an African-American attorney and a member of the Commission on Civil Rights, citing statistics from the Department of Justice, blacks are 2.5 times more likely to die from gunshot wounds than whites.

Kirsanov also said in an interview recently with Sean Hannity that following decades of a decline in crime rates due to “Stop and Frisk” strategies in high crime areas that, as a direct reaction to The Ferguson Effect, in New York City alone blacks are 35 times more likely to commit robberies; 38 times more likely to commit murders and 51 times more likely to engage in shootings than white people.

When is enough enough? When can we have an honest discussion about how to turn the tide?

In my opinion, not as long as black leaders like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Barack Obama and Louis Farrakhan are the mouthpieces for “The Movement.”

When the 1964 Civil Rights Bill was passed 28% of black families were fatherless, compared to 24% of white families. Not much difference. And by “fatherless” we aren’t talking about divorced. We are talking about no dad in the picture.

Today the percentage of white families with no dad in sight is still around one-fourth. The percentage of black families with father’s missing in action is 72%. Almost triple what it was when we passed The Civil Rights Act and almost concurrently began LBJ’s War on Poverty.

Something didn’t work out.

Again, just my opinion—I am not under the influence of any Associated Press delusions that I am omniscient—but it seems to me that what may be missing in an unhappy, underachieving black community that believes, right or wrong, that all its woes can be blamed on oppression by whites is the presence of a father figure.

Is that any crazier than blaming algebra and geometry?

But folks, that is not a problem white people can fix. For me to tell young black men how to be black fathers isn’t going to have a lot of credibility. For me to tell young black ladies that the number of babies you can have by different fathers is not a contest is not going to be well received.

Where are those black leaders?

From the Denver Broncos, Brandon Marshall, one of the most ardent NFL protestors of police brutality though I’ve never heard him cite a single, solitary specific, is putting his time and money where his mouth is in a big way. Marshall has met with Denver Police Chief Robert White, himself an African-American, to try and ease tensions and discuss solutions. Marshall has spoken to students at at least one inner-city elementary school to try and encourage attendance and completing education. Marshall has developed The Williams-Marshall Cares Leadership Program to expose teens in Denver and Las Vegas to black leaders.

He also works with local boy’s and girl’s clubs to lend encouragement and put himself out there as a role model.

I may strongly disagree with his bias about police oppression of blacks but I respect and applaud in the strongest terms his efforts to keep young men and women, whom the odds say may have no male role model in their lives, on a path to success.

He can’t do it alone, but I’ll bet he’s not.  Maybe he influences some youths in Las Vegas and Denver. Maybe some other players do more than massage their own egos and wail on in ignorance about topics they may be further removed from than I am and affect a few lives in other cities. Maybe it snow balls?

Maybe it doesn’t. A lot of people make a lot of money from keeping the black community thinking it is helplessly victimized and that they need the same people who’ve been shepherding them into stagnation and failure for 50 years to keep fighting the good fight on their behalf.

I know this blog is going to rankle some feathers. I’m sorry. You can either take my word for it or not that I’ve nothing against anyone because of their skin color.

I just believe there has to be a better way to solve the problem and I hope someone out there can help me think of a better solution that outlawing algebra and geometry.

 

Monday, October 23, 2017

Just The Facts, Ma'am

                Last week on Fox News Tomi Lahren—one of my favorite commentators at only 25-years-old—speculated that if you asked 100 different NFL football players to clarify specifically what they were protesting by kneeling during the national anthem before football games across America you would likely get 100 different answers.

                About a month ago Denver Bronco’s Head Coach Vance Joseph said of the protest, “I’m not even sure what it’s about anymore and that’s the issue in my opinion.”

                Several teams and individuals have been going out of their way to make clear they are not protesting our military or our flag although if it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck I don’t know how it’s a turkey.

                It seems like misguided football mouthpieces, the media plus a lot of white and black liberals who depend on a “victimized” coalition of black votes to stay in power and make money would like us to believe it’s only about police brutality against young black men and racism and oppression against blacks by white people in general. I am particularly confused but entertained by the young black millionaires who feel like they are enslaved.

                I have never been a black inner-city youth but Brandon Marshall, Gerald McCoy and Michael Bennet haven’t been old white fathers of police officers either. No one on the left has any interest in listening to anyone but themselves but if they did I could assure them that I know my son the police officer does not awaken each morning buoyed by the hope that today will be the day he gets to gun down some black guys.

                Because my son is a cop I may know more police officers than some of you.  Most of them say, “yes sir,” and “no ma’am” more than most young men I would speculate are raised in liberal households. Some of the cops I know have been shot at. Some have been the target of criminals using moving automobiles as weapons with the intent to maim or kill.  Some have shot back. Some have killed criminals in the line of duty. Fortunately, no cop I have known has been killed in the line of duty.

                All of them get up each day and put on their uniforms and, hopefully, their bullet-proof vests, and hit the streets with an actual and genuine interest in doing what the rest of us are hesitant to do to keep us safe from those who would harm us, take our property or our lives. Every single cop I know is a hero and I suspect almost every single one of them that I don’t know is also a hero.

                And those that don’t get that are a bigger part of the problem than the solution. In my opinion, of course.
         
              Anderson Cooper should roll his eyes and sigh heavily at this point at my ignorance of what he believes the problem to be. Silly white republicans.

                Do I realize that some cops are racist and bigoted and probably never should have been issued a badge? You bet. And when they’re discovered they should be stripped of their jobs and punished if they’ve committed a crime. There are about 670,000 police officers in the country. It is highly unlikely that every single one of them is the hero of whom I speak. It is highly likely that some of them need the consequences I just suggested. Satisfied?

                Does the left lie machine realize that black cops are 3.3 times more likely to shoot black criminals than white cops? Not my number. Root it out of Department of Justice statistics. It’s there.
        
                Let’s try looking at a few more facts instead of listening to the lamestream media and the broken-record liberal narrative, shall we? Using The Washington Post’s own research, Heather MacDonald (the attorney, author and researcher at The Manhattan Institute, not the comedienne who sometimes appeared on the Chelsea Handler Show) offers that in 2015 there were 987 total victims of fatal police shootings.

                White people accounted for 50% of those deaths, while constituting 62% of the population. Black people accounted for 26% of those deaths while only constituting 13% of the population. The good kids at WAPO thought they were really onto something.

                MacDonald has pointed out, however, that WAPO conveniently overlooked the statistics on the same DOJ website that point out that 62% of all robberies, 57% of all murders and 45% of all assaults are committed by blacks. It is a small wonder only 26% of cop-related fatalities were black people.

                Of 6,000 black homicides in 2015, 4% were the result of police shootings. (Twelve percent each of white and Hispanic homicides in 2015 were cop-related.) Almost all the rest of the 5,743 black homicides were black on black crime and that’s not even culling the police shootings for which deaths were the result of black cops shooting black perpetrators (3.3 times more, remember?).

                Can the myth of rampant white cop shootings of blacks really be the issue? Maybe the liberal narrative just means “unarmed” blacks. Ok. In 2015 there were 36 shootings of unarmed blacks by cops. Five were trying to grab the officer’s gun when they were shot. Somehow only two were the result of stray bullets (are bullets racist?) and one of those was a getaway driver for a criminal who was actively shooting at police at the time. Two more, originally identified as blacks (one with blond hair) turned out to be Hispanics. An undisclosed number were shot from accidental discharges in struggles with police.

                Let’s leave it at no more than 27 unarmed blacks were intentionally killed in police encounters, again, not culling for how many of those shootings were by black officers. Oh, hell, just say 36, why ruin a good narrative, plus someone already did the math for me with 36. Each death is tragic and sad to someone, even if the shooting were 100% justified and cleared by an investigative board, I’m not saying they aren’t. But I want to illustrate how out of proportion this NFLsteria may be. Those 36 deaths represent .0000018 of the black population per capita.

                I am sad for each and every one of them. I am sad for the 5,743 black people murdered by other black people for every reason from drug-deals-gone-bad, to gang disputes, to mistakes, to accidents, to being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

                But if I were going to protest or ask for a focus of resources on a problem, would I want to focus on eliminating 36 deaths? Or even 257? Or would I be more concerned about what we could do to minimize 22 times that many deaths?

                What is really going on?

                I have more data, and I’ll get to it. I don't have much else to do on Sundays this Fall. But I do have some observations about things some football players are doing about the 5,743 that I truly respect. But in the interest of keeping things close to 1,000 words which is where most attention spans end with stuff I write apparently, for now, that’s 30.

                (“That’s 30” is an old news term that meant tonight’s 30-minute news broadcast was over. It dates back to when there were actually journalists.)

               

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Viva Las Vegas Seems Wrong To Say


Viva Las Vegas

                So there is a literal ton of information on gun control v. gun rights. Both sides seem to have their own statistics and are steadfastly rooted in their convictions such that if either side were to try and force it’s will on the other side, half the nation would end up dead—and I don’t think it would just be the pro-gun rights crowd that did the killing, would it Nancy Sinatra?

                In the wake of the horrific shooting in Las Vegas on October 1, I peeled back the curtain to try and have a fair look at both sides of the issue. And that’s about all I did was peel back the curtain. I have been reading about gun control and gun rights all week and I am convinced you could do it full time for a year and not absorb all the material that’s out there.

                Full disclosure, I am a gun-rights guy. I do not belong to the NRA but I support them because they really aren’t an evil tool of the devil as some of the gun control enthusiasts would have you believe. I did not own a firearm until 2010 when Barack Obama’s policies and rhetoric regarding race, border security and crime scared me enough that I felt a need to arm myself to protect my family, but I have been a supporter of the Second Amendment for as long as I can remember knowing there was a Second Amendment.

                Prior to that I felt that having a gun in my home presented more risk than not having one. I no longer feel that way. Thanks Barry O.

                I’m also a big believer in common sense, which I find has people on both sides disagreeing with me.

                If you can wade past the extreme positions which are, “We should confiscate all guns in the United States from criminals (good luck) and people who’ve never broken a law in their life and put them in a big warehouse in New Mexico surrounded by mean Army guys,” to “I, by God, have a right to own an M252 mortar and keep it in my back yard because the Founding Fathers said I could,” both sides have some reasonable points to consider.

                Getting to a point of reason where people aren’t shouting at each other these days (shut up, Jimmy Kimmel) is way easier said than done, I’m afraid.

                Between 30,000 and 33,000 people were killed in 2016 from gunshot wounds. We don’t seem to be able to agree on the exact number. We do seem to agree that 65% of those deaths were suicides.

                I know gun control zealots would like you to believe that we could have prevented around 19,500 deaths by suicide if we just eliminated guns. I tend to side with the argument that if a person has made their mind up to kill themselves, the method is a secondary consideration.

                About 15% more of those deaths are inflicted by law enforcement in the act of stopping, preventing or pursuing crime and criminals. That gets into a whole other false narrative that has angry young millionaires kneeling in football stadiums all over the country right now and we’ll deal with that another day.

                About 900 deaths, or 3% or so, are the result of accidental shootings and to me those are the most tragic and the biggest reason you might want to make a personal choice not to have a gun in the house but not a big enough reason to deprive everyone else of the right to own a legal firearm.

                Of the 5100 deaths that were actually the result of person on person gun violence, a little more than 25% of them were from four cities—Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit and Washington, D.C.  1169 gun deaths were in California (Los Angeles was the big leader but the rest were well dispersed over the rest of the state) and one shooting death of the homicide variety took place in Alabama. Between California and Alabama who do you think has the stricter gun control laws?

                Some of you may have seen an opinion piece in the Washington Post last week by Leah Libresco, a statistician and former newswriter for a data journalism site. Leah and her staff actually did spend three months researching gun deaths in the United States certain that they would find crushing evidence in favor of gun control.

                They did not and they were honest enough to say so.

                I’ve seen numerous Facebook posts this week citing how successful Australia’s gun ban has been in preventing mass shootings. Libresco confirms that mass shootings in Australia are rare indeed, but before their campaign of gun buybacks and bans mass shooting were no more or less rare than they are today, proving…nothing.

                Libresco also cites British statistics where mass shootings were also rare before the big push to ban guns and concludes that any relationship between gun restrictions and gun related crimes and deaths is negligible in either direction.

                Also citing suicides as 2/3’s of gun deaths in the United States, Libresco also confirms that about 20% of other gun deaths are inflicted upon each other by young men ages 15-34, usually in gang and/or drug related activity. The only other statistically significant group she identified were about 1,700 women shot in domestic violence incidents.

                Her overall conclusion is that narrowly tailored interventions, aimed at the groups that constitute the biggest threats, are far and away more effective than sweeping gun control laws and even bans.

                Older men, she suggests, make up by far the largest single group of gun suicides and could benefit from better access to specific help and care for their situations. Hello, health care professionals looking to make a difference.

                Women in specific situations of repeated abuse (most domestic shootings rarely happen in the first reported incident) by easily identifiable partners need help. They need to be prioritized by police departments and restraining orders need to be enforced without the cops having to worry they’re going to be portrayed as bad guys for enforcing them. I don’t know what the magic number is but if it’s one or two calls to the police, that’s fine with me as the point at which the abuser’s guns need to be confiscated and he needs to go on a list prohibiting him from purchasing or being in possession of a firearm.

                Sadly, guns would still fall into the wrong hands and some abused women would still end up dead. But, in an effort to minimize the risk, taking away the gun rights of a fellow who may not be in the group who would shoot his wife or girlfriend but has a history of beating her doesn’t bother me at all whereas taking away the gun rights of every American who has done nothing wrong because one crazy citizen lost his stuff and murdered 58 people bothers me a lot.

                Libresco recommends that young male gang bangers at risk of violence be identified and that interventions take place before the shootings rather than after. Can you say, “Stop and frisk?”

                Racist? Oh really? Do you want to get serious about reducing gun-related deaths or do you just want to be able to say all conservative “guntoters” are bad people at your next wine and cheese gathering? Sorry Portland.

                I don’t know what to do to eradicate evil. Nobody does. And rending our garments and wailing into the night sky that banning all firearms would end violence is as silly a notion as it is dramatic. Doing nothing is probably not a good answer either.

                If we could have a sane, calm discussion between people whose ideologies could be set aside for a moment while we tried to figure out how to identify the next Stephen Paddock there are a bunch of smart people out there who don’t need to scream or exchange rhetoric to share an original idea. I know, we’re probably going to have to leave it in the hands of politicians anyway.

 In the meantime, get off your knees and let us reinstitute stop and frisk and make a real difference in gun violence at the risk of being politically incorrect.